Skip Navigation

visitation

Articles tagged with: visitation

  • In re Interest of Dylan S.

    Filed on April 27, 2010
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-09-710
    SUMMARY: Evidence of the father’s unstable and inappropriate living conditions for housing his toddler child and his inability to be alert and attentive due to his mental health conditions and prescription medications were sufficient for the child to be adjudicated.  
    Dylan, DOB 5/07, is the subject [...]

  • In re Interest of Nylang M. et al

    Filed on November 10, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-09-505
    SUMMARY: Termination was proper because the parents substantially and repeatedly neglected the children by failing to consistently visit for a substantial period of time and from refusing to comply with the case plan goals.  
    The children, Yiech Y, DOB 10/94, Gach Y., DOB 6/96, Nyakueth Y., DOB [...]

  • In re Interest of Carlos R., et al

    Filed on July 21, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-09-089
    SUMMARY: Grandparents no longer have a legal interest in court proceedings or a right to visitation once parents’ parental rights have been terminated, and could not intervene as foster or prospective adoptive parents as a matter of right.  
    The children, Carlos, Carlynn and Joshowah, were removed from [...]

  • In re Interest of Keijuan W. & Keijon T.

    Filed on February 3, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-866
    SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights was in the children’s best interests because the mother is incapable of providing a stable and permanent home now and in the near future.  
    The children, Keijuan, DOB 4/24/98, and Keijon, DOB 10/30/00, were placed in the state’s custody on September 27, [...]

  • In re Guardianship of Andrew K.

    Filed on September 23, 2008
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-137
    SUMMARY: The termination of a guardianship was properly denied because there was clear and convincing evidence of continuing parental unfitness, including an unstable marital relationship, frequent changes in residences and schools, and ongoing fear of the mother of the father.  
    Andrew (DOB 1/2002) is the child of [...]

  • In re Interest of Sierra W., et al

    Filed on August 26, 2008
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-07-1231, A-07-1365
    SUMMARY: The court violated the parents’ rights when it failed to adopt DHHS’ plan of reunification because there was no evidence to show that the plan of reunification was not in the children’s best interest. Failure to adopt the plan and denial of the parents’ visitation [...]

  • In re Interest of Courtney S., et al

    Filed on June 17, 2008
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-07-1295
    SUMMARY: The mother did not challenge DHHS parameters on visitation or timely appeal the court’s order permitting DHHS’ restrictions, and her argument therefore has no merit on appeal. Termination of parental rights was proper as to all children as the mother did not truly begin working [...]

  • In re Interest of Dakota W., et al

    Filed on June 10, 2008
    Memorandum opinion, not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-050
    SUMMARY: A father who voluntary relinquished his parental rights has no standing to request supervised visitation with the children. His request for visitation with a child whose parental rights he still retains was properly denied due to the fact that the serious nature of the [...]

  • In re Interest of Madison S.

    Filed on May 6, 2008
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-07-1259
    SUMMARY: Termination was in the children’s best interests because the mother did not substantially comply with the rehabilitation plan in the 20 months the children were out of the home, as she made minimal progress in addressing her parenting issues, did not undergo random drug testing, [...]

  • In re Interest of A.W., et al

    November 27th 2007
    16 Neb. App. 210, 742 N.W.2d 250
    A-07-270

    SUMMARY: An order restricting the father’s visitation schedule (from several times per week to every month to every other month) significantly impacted his parental right and was thus a final, appealable order. With his incarceration, length of travel to visit and limitation on positive interaction at [...]