Skip Navigation

rehabilitation

Working to Improve the Lives of Nebraska's Children

Articles tagged with: rehabilitation

  • In re Interest of Allen G., et al.

    Filed on November 3, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-09-127 through A-09-129, A-09-227, A-09-228
    SUMMARY: The absence of the guardian ad litem during the termination trial was not plain error. Because the father was not provided with a case plan until late in the case and there was little evidence establishing his failure to comply, termination [...]

  • In re Interest of Dannie H.

    Filed on May 19, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-1007
    SUMMARY: The mother’s consistent and substantial progress in the 17 months between the filing of the termination petition and the completion of the TPR trial make it error to terminate her parental rights.  
    Dannie, DOB 10/30/02, was removed from her mother Michelle on April 26, 2004, after [...]

  • In re Interest of Gabriel N. et al.

    Filed on February 24, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-915 through A-08-918
    SUMMARY: Termination was in the children’s best interests because the mother did not make significant progress toward rehabilitation and reunification and the children need safety and permanency that the mother cannot provide.  
    The children, Jesse (DOB 9/23/96), Gabriel (DOB 9/29/98), Seth (DOB 3/29/00) and [...]

  • In re Interest of Amoria M., et al

    Filed on Feb 27, 2007
    Nebraska Court of Appeals
    SUMMARY: Retaining jurisdiction over the children was in their best interests because “the permanency goal ha[d] not been met and the family’s lack of financial stability is directly related to their inability to care for their home and children.” The recommendations of the LB1184 team, which included [...]

  • In re Interest of Aaron D.

    Filed on January 28, 2005
    269 Neb. 249, 691 N.W.2d 164
    SUMMARY: Because the testimony of the sole witness for the State was primarily based on hearsay and the testimony from the mother’s therapist that the mother was improving her parenting skills and that the child would be harmed by termination was not contradicted, the State did [...]

  • In re Interest of Ty M. & Devon M.

    Filed on January 17, 2003
    265 Neb. 150, 655 N.W.2d 672
    SUMMARY: During an appeal of termination of parental rights, the parents cannot collaterally attack the adjudication or case plans adopted pursuant to adjudication. The condition of the home, which was the basis for adjudication, was merely a manifestation of the parents’ inability to properly care [...]

  • In re Interest of Constance G.

    Filed on March 24, 1995
    247 Neb. 629, 529 N.W.2d 534
    SUMMARY: Adjudication of the child pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. section 43-247(3)(a) is contingent only upon the situation in which the child finds him or herself; the fault of the parent is not the issue. Prior to ordering a rehabilitation plan, the court must hold [...]

  • In re Interest of L.J., J.J. and J.N.J

    Filed on May 31, 1985
    368 N.W.2d 474, 220 Neb. 102
    SUMMARY: The rehabilitation plan must be reasonable and under the direction of the juvenile court. Siblings have the right to know each other. Delays in progression of the case due to court or agency conduct cannot be used to justify termination of parental rights [...]