Skip Navigation

order

Articles tagged with: order

  • In re Interest of Desiree F. and Briana F.

    Filed on March 30, 2010
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-09-1013
    SUMMARY: A denial of child in-chambers testimony is not a final, appealable order.  
    (more…)

  • In re Interest of Marcella B. and Juan S.

    Filed on March 12, 2010
    279 Neb. 568, 778 N.W.2d 744
    SUMMARY: The Nebraska Supreme Court affirms the decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals dismissing the appeal on the basis that a denial to allow in-chambers testimony from the child is not a final, appealable order.  
    Full Opinion

  • In re Interest of Marcella B. and Juan S.

    Filed on November 24, 2009
    18 Neb. App. 153, 775 N.W.2d 470
    SUMMARY: A denial to allow in-chambers testimony from the child is not a final, appealable order.  
    Marcella B. and Juan S. were removed from the mother on January 26, 2009, on allegations of inappropriate physical contact and failure to provide appropriate care, support and/or supervision. [...]

  • In re Interest of Ethan M.

    Filed on October 13, 2009
    774 N.W.2d 766, 18 Neb. App. 63
    SUMMARY: Permanent modification of custody in an abuse/neglect case cannot be made in a dispositional order and instead must occur pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. section 42-364 through a complaint to modify, a modification hearing and findings that there has been a material change in [...]

  • In re Interest of Lawrence H.

    Filed on June 13, 2006
    Not designated for permanent publication
    Nebraska Court of Appeals, A-05-1409
    SUMMARY: A pending motion to transfer in the juvenile court cannot be appealed since there is no final order by which the parents can appeal. 
    Faren H. was born on June 2, 2005.  On June 7, 2005, the state filed a petition to adjudicate [...]

  • In re Interest of R.G.

    Filed on June 14, 1991
    238 Neb. 405, 470 N.W.2d 780
    SUMMARY: Fourteen days between removal and the protective custody hearing is on the brink of unreasonableness but does not violate due process. The protective custody hearing order is a final, appealable order but the ex parte order is not. 
    On August 10, 1990, R.G., an infant, [...]