Skip Navigation

order

Articles tagged with: order

« Older Entries

  • In re Interest of Elizabeth S.

    Filed on January 6, 2012
    282 Neb. 1015, ____ N.W.2d ____
    SUMMARY: A juvenile court should exercise its authority to order DHHS to accept a relinquishment of the child when it is in the best interests of that child to do so and not the interests of a future born child. 
    Elizabeth, DOB May 2009, was born prematurely [...]

  • In re Interest of Tyler W.

    Filed on August 9, 2011
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-11-115, A-11-116
    SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights was proper where the children had been in foster care for a substantial period of time, where the father had been incarcerated off and on during that time and had only sporadically visited the children. 
    Tyler W., DOB 5/07, and Landon [...]

  • In re Interest of Javontae T.

    Filed on March 22, 2011
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-10-906
    SUMMARY: A parent cannot delay a proceeding by challenging paternity when a default order of paternity had been entered years earlier and has remained uncontested by that parent.  
    Javontae, DOB 6/93, is the child of James, who has been incarcerated a majority of Javontae’s life. [...]

  • In re Interest of Ramon N.

    Filed on October 5, 2010
    18 Neb. App. 574, 789 N.W.2d 272
    SUMMARY: Refusal to invalidate an adjudication order that was not ICWA compliant was proper because ICWA provisions apply prospectively from the formal identification of the child as Indian, because there was no basis for collateral attack and because Neb. Rev. Stat. 43-1507 does not apply [...]

  • In re Interest of Emma J.

    Filed on August 10, 2010
    Supplemental Opinion
    18 Neb. App. 529, 789 N.W.2d 528
    SUMMARY: A modification of text was made in the opinion of In re Interest of Emma, 18 Neb. App. 389, 782 N.W.2d 330 (2010), namely that a September 30, 2009, where active efforts findings were improperly made was a continuation of a previous order [...]

  • In re Interest of Gabriela H.

    Filed on July 23, 2010
    280 Neb. 284, 785 N.W.2d 843
    SUMMARY: Where a child has been adjudicated pursuant to N.R.S. 43-247(3)(a) and a permanency objective of adoption has been established, a juvenile court has authority under the juvenile code to order DHHS to accept a tendered relinquishment of parental rights.
    Gabriela H., DOB 9/97, was left at [...]

  • In re Interest of Antonio O. and Gisela O.

    Filed on June 1, 2010
    784 N.W.2d 457, 18 Neb. App. 449
    SUMMARY: Failure to notify the appropriate foreign consulate as required by the Vienna Convention and N.R.S. 43-3804 is not a violation of the parent’s due process rights. 
    Antonio, DOB 10/04, and Gisela, DOB 7/06, are the children of Jose, a Mexican national. Antonio and his [...]

  • In re Interest of Patience I

    Filed on May 4, 2010
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-09-1024
    SUMMARY: A 60-day delay between the ex parte order and protective custody hearing was not unreasonable due to the unusual circumstances of the case where DHHS did not obtain physical custody of the child until 1 ½ months after the ex parte order was issued. [...]

  • In re Interest of Desiree F. and Briana F.

    Filed on March 30, 2010
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-09-1013
    SUMMARY: A denial of child in-chambers testimony is not a final, appealable order.  
    (more…)

  • In re Interest of Marcella B. and Juan S.

    Filed on March 12, 2010
    279 Neb. 568, 778 N.W.2d 744
    SUMMARY: The Nebraska Supreme Court affirms the decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals dismissing the appeal on the basis that a denial to allow in-chambers testimony from the child is not a final, appealable order.  
    Full Opinion