Skip Navigation

hearsay

Articles tagged with: hearsay

  • In re Interest of Shayla H. et al.

    Filed on May 18, 2010
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-09-1142
    SUMMARY: Because the father did not show how he was prejudiced by judicial notice of evidence in the earlier adjudication hearing, there was no finding that the court erred. A district court order denying an ex parte protection order was properly excluded because it only [...]

  • In re Interest of Patience I

    Filed on May 4, 2010
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-09-1024
    SUMMARY: A 60-day delay between the ex parte order and protective custody hearing was not unreasonable due to the unusual circumstances of the case where DHHS did not obtain physical custody of the child until 1 ½ months after the ex parte order was issued. [...]

  • In re Interest of Enrique G.

    Filed on March 24, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-1136
    SUMMARY: The child comes within the meaning of 43-247(3)(a) because he is at risk for harm due to the father’s failure to pay child support and lack of any evidence that he provided the child with proper parental care and support.  
    Enrique, DOB 5/1/00, is the child [...]

  • In re Interest of Brittany M., et al

    Filed on April 1, 2008
    Memorandum Opinion, not designated for permanent publication
    A07-719
    SUMMARY: Admitting evidence involving sexual abuse of the children by the parents in a termination of parental rights trial where sexual abuse was not a basis for termination was not in error because such evidence is relevant to whether termination is in the best interests [...]

  • In re Interest of Aaron D.

    Filed on January 28, 2005
    269 Neb. 249, 691 N.W.2d 164
    SUMMARY: Because the testimony of the sole witness for the State was primarily based on hearsay and the testimony from the mother’s therapist that the mother was improving her parenting skills and that the child would be harmed by termination was not contradicted, the State did [...]

  • In re Interest of Constance G.

    Filed: February 27, 1998
    254 Neb. 96, 575 N.W.2d 133
    SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights reversed after de novo review of record. Hearsay evidence was ruled inadmissible after analysis of due process. <br />&nbsp;
    Larry G, father of Constance G, appealed the juvenile court’s decision to terminate parental rights. The court of appeals reversed and the rights of the [...]