Skip Navigation

case plan

Articles tagged with: case plan

Newer Entries »

  • In re Interest of Courtney S., et al

    Filed on November 14, 2006
    Not designated for permanent publication
    Nebraska Court of Appeals, A-06-546
    SUMMARY: “To challenge a dispositional order entered by the juvenile court on the basis of an assertion that the permanency objection differs from the case plan proposed by DHHS and that such a ruling and plan so adopted is not the in the [...]

  • In re Interest of Eden K. & Allison L.

    Filed on July 3, 2006
    14 Neb. App. 867
    SUMMARY: The sole testimony of two caseworkers with limited firsthand knowledge of the mother’s progress did not sufficiently establish that termination was in the children’s best interests, such as evidence that adoption was a possibility or of the needs or interests of the children. 
    On April 22, 2004, a [...]

  • In re Interest of Aaron D.

    Filed on January 28, 2005
    269 Neb. 249, 691 N.W.2d 164
    SUMMARY: Because the testimony of the sole witness for the State was primarily based on hearsay and the testimony from the mother’s therapist that the mother was improving her parenting skills and that the child would be harmed by termination was not contradicted, the State did [...]

  • In re Interest of Tanisha P.

    Filed: June 6, 2000
    9 Neb.App. 344, 611 N.W.2d 418
    SUMMARY: Change of placement was affirmed after all parties working with family agreed it was in child’s best interest to return to legal guardian after sexual contact by siblings.  
    The state filed a petition in juvenile court that alleged Tanisha’s two older brothers had sexual contact with [...]

  • In re Interest of Kantril P. and Chenelle P.

    Filed on August 13, 1999
    257 Neb. 450, 598 N.W.2d 729
    SUMMARY: It is not unconstitutional for the guardian ad litem to perform both the investigatory duties of a guardian ad litem and bring and try a motion to terminate parental rights as authorized in Neb. Rev. Stat. section 43-272.01(2). As a ground for termination under [...]

  • In re Interest of J.H.

    Filed on March 12, 1993
    242 Neb. 906, 497 N.W.2d 346
    SUMMARY: Neb. Rev. Stat. section 43-285(2), which provides that a party must prove by a preponderance of evidence that the proposed DHHS case plan is not in the child’s best interests in order for the court to disapprove it, is not unconstitutional as applied in this [...]

  • In re Interest of L.J., J.J. and J.N.J

    Filed on May 31, 1985
    368 N.W.2d 474, 220 Neb. 102
    SUMMARY: The rehabilitation plan must be reasonable and under the direction of the juvenile court. Siblings have the right to know each other. Delays in progression of the case due to court or agency conduct cannot be used to justify termination of parental rights [...]