Skip Navigation

22 months

Articles tagged with: 22 months

« Older Entries

  • In re Interest of Dut A. and Akon A.

    Filed on July 5, 2011
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-10-1036
    SUMMARY: Termination was in the children’s best interest where the mother failed to comply with the rehabilitation plan despite assistance from state workers, which included additional efforts addressing cultural barriers. 
    Dut A., DOB 1/96, and Akon A., DOB 11/99 were removed from the care of the mother, [...]

  • In re Interest of Kenna S.

    Filed on April 28, 2009
    766 N.W.2d 424, 17 Neb. App. 544
    SUMMARY: The time a parent spends incarcerated shall not be excluded from the determination of whether a child has been out-of-home 15 of the most recent 22 months. As the father did not take steps to undergo sex offender treatment in the two months [...]

  • In re Interest of Dannon C. et al.

    Filed on March 24, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-1153
    SUMMARY: The father’s testimony as to his paternity of the child was sufficient to establish paternity. Reasonable efforts were not required to be proven in the termination of parental rights as the bases for termination were 43-292(1) and (7).  
    Laquisha, DOB 3/17/97, is the child of [...]

  • In re Interest of Keijuan W. & Keijon T.

    Filed on February 3, 2009
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-866
    SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights was in the children’s best interests because the mother is incapable of providing a stable and permanent home now and in the near future.  
    The children, Keijuan, DOB 4/24/98, and Keijon, DOB 10/30/00, were placed in the state’s custody on September 27, [...]

  • In re Interest of Ashantay H.

    Filed on October 14, 2008
    Not designated for permanent publication
    A-08-049
    SUMMARY: The statutory ground for termination where the child must be out of the home 15 of the most recent 22 months requires “clear and convincing evidence of circumstances as compelling and pertinent to a child’s best interests as to those enumerated in the other subsections”, given [...]

  • In re Interest of Courtney S., et al

    Filed on June 17, 2008
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-07-1295
    SUMMARY: The mother did not challenge DHHS parameters on visitation or timely appeal the court’s order permitting DHHS’ restrictions, and her argument therefore has no merit on appeal. Termination of parental rights was proper as to all children as the mother did not truly begin working [...]

  • In re Interest of Madison S.

    Filed on May 6, 2008
    Not designated for permanent publication, A-07-1259
    SUMMARY: Termination was in the children’s best interests because the mother did not substantially comply with the rehabilitation plan in the 20 months the children were out of the home, as she made minimal progress in addressing her parenting issues, did not undergo random drug testing, [...]

  • In re Interest of Brittany M., et al

    Filed on April 1, 2008
    Memorandum Opinion, not designated for permanent publication
    A07-719
    SUMMARY: Admitting evidence involving sexual abuse of the children by the parents in a termination of parental rights trial where sexual abuse was not a basis for termination was not in error because such evidence is relevant to whether termination is in the best interests [...]

  • In re Interest of Xavier H.

    Filed on Oct 19 2007
    Nebraska Supreme Court
    No. S-06-841

    SUMMARY: The Nebraska Supreme Court overturned a Court of Appeals decision upholding termination of a mother’s rights even though the medical condition that had prompted the initial adjudication had resolved. The Court stated that the fact a child has been in out of home placement for [...]

  • In re Interest of Stephanie G.

    Filed on August 29, 2006
    Not designated for permanent publication
    Nebraska Court of Appeals, A-06-194
    SUMMARY: Even though the mother was “not at fault for her present situation and that she very much desire[d] [her daughter’s] return” the court recognized that “when a parent is unable or unwilling to rehabilitate himself or herself within a reasonable time, the [...]